PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.10%
Revenue growth below 50% of SNAP's 27.62%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
5.22%
Cost growth 50-75% of SNAP's 7.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
12.54%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SNAP's 50.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.29%
Margin expansion below 50% of SNAP's 17.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.30%
R&D growth above 1.5x SNAP's 6.34%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
20.59%
G&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 10.81%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
14.63%
Marketing expense growth 50-75% of SNAP's 19.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
-75.00%
Other expenses reduction while SNAP shows 91.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
17.07%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SNAP's 10.45%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.96%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 9.45%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
2.54%
Interest expense growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.71%
D&A growth less than half of SNAP's 20.31%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
7.51%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SNAP's 53.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.23%
EBITDA margin decline while SNAP shows 63.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.69%
Operating income growth below 50% of SNAP's 36.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.17%
Operating margin decline while SNAP shows 50.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.80%
Other expenses growth less than half of SNAP's 114.54%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
8.78%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SNAP's 46.21%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.09%
Pre-tax margin decline while SNAP shows 57.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.63%
Tax expense growth while SNAP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.45%
Net income growth below 50% of SNAP's 47.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.49%
Net margin decline while SNAP shows 58.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.88%
EPS growth below 50% of SNAP's 48.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.39%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SNAP's 48.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.03%
Share count reduction while SNAP shows 3.04% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.10%
Diluted share reduction while SNAP shows 3.04% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.