PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.07%
Revenue growth 50-75% of SNAP's 21.59%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
10.00%
Cost growth above 1.5x SNAP's 1.28%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
17.57%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SNAP's 36.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.30%
Margin expansion below 50% of SNAP's 11.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.56%
R&D growth above 1.5x SNAP's 5.38%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
12.19%
G&A growth 1.1-1.25x SNAP's 10.93%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of necessary spending.
23.44%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x SNAP's 12.74%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-78.57%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
15.00%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SNAP's 8.58%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
13.44%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SNAP's 5.99%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-15.00%
Interest expense reduction while SNAP shows 0.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.95%
D&A growth less than half of SNAP's 7.24%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
17.56%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SNAP's 316.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.29%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 277.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.74%
Operating income growth below 50% of SNAP's 86.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.03%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 88.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-16.90%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
20.24%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SNAP's 150.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.59%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SNAP's 141.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
76.37%
Tax expense growth less than half of SNAP's 1213.61%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
11.87%
Net income growth below 50% of SNAP's 131.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.62%
Net margin decline while SNAP shows 125.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.76%
EPS growth below 50% of SNAP's 121.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SNAP's 121.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.04%
Share count reduction while SNAP shows 1.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.10%
Diluted share reduction while SNAP shows 5.56% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.