PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.06%
Similar revenue growth to SNAP's 15.18%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
45.84%
Cost growth above 1.5x SNAP's 3.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
8.32%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SNAP's 23.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.67%
Margin decline while SNAP shows 7.38% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.55%
R&D growth above 1.5x SNAP's 3.67%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-8.84%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
21.01%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x SNAP's 9.18%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-897.06%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.71%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SNAP's 0.83%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
16.85%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SNAP's 1.51%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-58.44%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
9.24%
D&A growth less than half of SNAP's 33.62%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
70.76%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 25.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
47.13%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 35.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
94.39%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 33.92%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
67.49%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 42.63%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-184.09%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
10.28%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of SNAP's 18.85%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-4.98%
Pre-tax margin decline while SNAP shows 29.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
26.67%
Tax expense growth while SNAP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.87%
Net income growth below 50% of SNAP's 19.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.78%
Net margin decline while SNAP shows 30.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.32%
EPS growth below 50% of SNAP's 18.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.32%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SNAP's 18.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.64%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.75%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.