PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.94%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-26.73%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-5.42%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.20%
Margin expansion while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.99%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-6.48%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-33.45%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
100.00%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of SNAP's 156.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-12.16%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-16.87%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
71.88%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x SNAP's 10.79%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
6.23%
D&A growth while SNAP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.52%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
132.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of SNAP's 1199.28%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
18.83%
Pre-tax income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.43%
Pre-tax margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.82%
Tax expense growth less than half of SNAP's 62.74%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
22.70%
Net income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.77%
Net margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.57%
EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.93%
Share count reduction while SNAP shows 0.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.67%
Diluted share reduction while SNAP shows 0.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.