PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.71%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 8.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
-2.67%
Cost reduction while SNAP shows 12.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
15.61%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 4.04%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.49%
Margin expansion while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.39%
R&D reduction while SNAP shows 4.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
44.33%
G&A growth above 1.5x SNAP's 13.94%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
3.61%
Similar marketing expense growth to SNAP's 4.53%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.83%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 6.70%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
5.55%
Total costs growth 50-75% of SNAP's 8.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
110.91%
Interest expense growth while SNAP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.92%
D&A growth less than half of SNAP's 12.69%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
17.61%
EBITDA growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.29%
EBITDA margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.02%
Operating income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.23%
Operating margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-223.75%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
27.18%
Pre-tax income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.85%
Pre-tax margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.82%
Tax expense reduction while SNAP shows 76.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
36.42%
Net income growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.12%
Net margin growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.10%
EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.45%
Diluted EPS growth while SNAP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.73%
Share count reduction while SNAP shows 1.38% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.62%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 1.38%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.