PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.11%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-13.71%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-8.02%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.20%
Margin expansion while SNAP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-5.13%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
50.94%
G&A growth while SNAP reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-20.52%
Marketing expense reduction while SNAP shows 0.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.22%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-4.59%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.62%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
6.37%
D&A growth while SNAP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-14.59%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.19%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.71%
Other expenses reduction while SNAP shows 837.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.61%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.98%
Tax expense reduction while SNAP shows 111.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.76%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.99%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.63%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.82%
Share count reduction while SNAP shows 0.53% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.19%
Diluted share reduction while SNAP shows 0.53% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.