PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
25.65%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Communication Services median of 1.27%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
6.08%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Communication Services median of 0.78%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
28.85%
Growth of 28.85% versus flat Communication Services gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
2.55%
Margin change of 2.55% versus flat Communication Services margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
1.56%
R&D change of 1.56% versus flat Communication Services spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
17.58%
G&A change of 17.58% versus flat Communication Services overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
20.86%
Marketing expense change of 20.86% versus flat Communication Services spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-366.67%
Other expenses reduction while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
10.13%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Communication Services median of 2.40%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
9.10%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Communication Services median of 2.60%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
12.00%
Interest expense change of 12.00% versus flat Communication Services costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
3.89%
D&A change of 3.89% versus flat Communication Services D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
39.72%
EBITDA change of 39.72% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
11.21%
Margin change of 11.21% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
46.52%
Income change of 46.52% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
16.61%
Margin change of 16.61% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-172.34%
Other expenses reduction while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
43.27%
Income change of 43.27% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
14.03%
Margin change of 14.03% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
79.52%
Tax expense change of 79.52% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
35.88%
Income change of 35.88% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
19.37%
Margin change of 19.37% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
49.40%
EPS change of 49.40% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
47.56%
Diluted EPS change of 47.56% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.25%
Share count change of 0.25% versus stable Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
0.24%
Diluted share change of 0.24% versus stable Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify approach.