PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.06%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Communication Services median of 1.45%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
45.84%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Communication Services median of 2.87%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
8.32%
Growth of 8.32% versus flat Communication Services gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-6.67%
Margin decline while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
6.55%
R&D change of 6.55% versus flat Communication Services spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-8.84%
G&A reduction while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
21.01%
Marketing expense change of 21.01% versus flat Communication Services spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-897.06%
Other expenses reduction while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
6.71%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Communication Services median of 2.48%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
16.85%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Communication Services median of 3.15%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-58.44%
Interest expense reduction while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
9.24%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Communication Services median of 0.41%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
70.76%
EBITDA change of 70.76% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
47.13%
Margin change of 47.13% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
94.39%
Income change of 94.39% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
67.49%
Margin change of 67.49% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-184.09%
Other expenses reduction while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
10.28%
Income change of 10.28% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-4.98%
Pre-tax margin decline while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
26.67%
Tax expense change of 26.67% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
5.87%
Income change of 5.87% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-8.78%
Net margin decline while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
7.32%
EPS change of 7.32% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
7.32%
Diluted EPS change of 7.32% versus flat Communication Services. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-1.64%
Share count reduction while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-1.75%
Diluted share reduction while Communication Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.