PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
72.83
Positive P/E while SNAP shows losses. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
43.36
P/S above 1.5x SNAP's 10.82. Michael Burry would check for mean reversion risks.
5.35
Similar P/B to SNAP's 7.03. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
161.27
P/FCF less than half of SNAP's 611.71. David Dodd would verify if cash flow quality justifies this discount.
87.92
P/OCF 50-75% of SNAP's 164.47. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
5.35
Similar fair value ratio to SNAP's 7.03. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
0.34%
Positive earnings while SNAP shows losses. John Neff would investigate earnings advantage.
0.62%
FCF yield exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 0.16%. David Dodd would verify if cash flow quality justifies this premium.