PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
20.70
Positive P/E while SNAP shows losses. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
13.13
Similar P/S to SNAP's 14.00. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
2.93
P/B 50-75% of SNAP's 5.45. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
1151.56
P/FCF 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 872.26. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if premium reflects better growth prospects.
37.55
P/OCF less than half of SNAP's 282.34. David Dodd would verify if operating efficiency justifies this discount.
2.93
Fair value ratio 50-75% of SNAP's 5.45. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
1.21%
Positive earnings while SNAP shows losses. John Neff would investigate earnings advantage.
0.09%
FCF yield 75-90% of SNAP's 0.11%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior growth prospects.