PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
17.80
P/E less than half of SNAP's 508.02. Charlie Munger would verify if competitive advantages justify such a discount.
30.66
P/S above 1.5x SNAP's 11.88. Michael Burry would check for mean reversion risks.
8.12
Similar P/B to SNAP's 7.55. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
109.39
Similar P/FCF to SNAP's 101.42. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
53.01
P/OCF 50-75% of SNAP's 80.19. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
8.12
Similar fair value ratio to SNAP's 7.55. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
1.40%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x SNAP's 0.05%. David Dodd would verify if earnings quality justifies this premium.
0.91%
Similar FCF yield to SNAP's 0.99%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar yields reflect similar quality.