PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.440.14 (-2.51%)
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.66%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-0.66%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
194.23%
EBIT growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 49.51%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
194.23%
Operating income growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 49.51%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
127.94%
Net income growth under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 22400.00%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
128.57%
EPS growth under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 21100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
128.57%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 21100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-204.88%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-292.31%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
1.13%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
1.13%
Positive 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
1.13%
Positive 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-542.92%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-542.92%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-542.92%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
117.29%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 5.56% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
117.29%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 5.56%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
117.29%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 5.56%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.77%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. HUH1V.HE's 14.27%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-6.29%
Negative asset growth while HUH1V.HE invests at 6.72%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.46%
Positive BV/share change while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-17.87%
We’re deleveraging while HUH1V.HE stands at 5.94%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.