PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.440.14 (-2.51%)
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.65%
Negative revenue growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 10.46%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-3.65%
Negative gross profit growth while HUH1V.HE is at 15.35%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-169.57%
Negative EBIT growth while HUH1V.HE is at 45.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-169.57%
Negative operating income growth while HUH1V.HE is at 45.99%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-310.71%
Negative net income growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 54.19%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-312.50%
Negative EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 57.89%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-312.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 57.89%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.84%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.84%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.43%
Negative OCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 272.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-160.87%
Negative FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 138.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
7.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of HUH1V.HE's 11.48%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
7.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of HUH1V.HE's 11.48%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
7.74%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of HUH1V.HE's 11.48%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
181.17%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
181.17%
Positive OCF/share growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
181.17%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
40.69%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 24.76% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
40.69%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 24.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
40.69%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 24.76%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.58%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-7.23%
Negative asset growth while HUH1V.HE invests at 1.59%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-5.44%
We have a declining book value while HUH1V.HE shows 1.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-10.45%
We’re deleveraging while HUH1V.HE stands at 13.70%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.