PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.440.14 (-2.51%)
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.67%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-79.85%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
59.38%
Positive EBIT growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
59.38%
Positive operating income growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
44.07%
Positive net income growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
35.29%
Positive EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
35.29%
Positive diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-13.56%
Share reduction while HUH1V.HE is at 12.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-13.56%
Reduced diluted shares while HUH1V.HE is at 12.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.88%
OCF growth under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 25.79%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
107.14%
FCF growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 61.79%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
5.21%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 2.15%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
5.21%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 2.15%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
5.21%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 2.15%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-71.64%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-71.64%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-71.64%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
54.17%
Positive 10Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
54.17%
Positive 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
54.17%
Positive short-term CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.39%
Inventory growth well above HUH1V.HE's 3.23%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
0.21%
Asset growth well under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 4.71%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
11.60%
Positive BV/share change while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
3.40%
Debt shrinking faster vs. HUH1V.HE's 12.05%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.