PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.440.14 (-2.51%)
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.94%
Negative revenue growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 1.16%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-51.13%
Negative gross profit growth while HUH1V.HE is at 10.67%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1553.85%
Negative EBIT growth while HUH1V.HE is at 14.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1553.85%
Negative operating income growth while HUH1V.HE is at 14.52%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-533.33%
Negative net income growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 30.22%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-472.73%
Negative EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 43.75%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-472.73%
Negative diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 43.75%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
10.58%
Slight or no buybacks while HUH1V.HE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
10.58%
Slight or no buyback while HUH1V.HE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.78%
Negative OCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 132.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-1800.00%
Negative FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 220.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-17.46%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-17.46%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-17.46%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-69.73%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 53.23%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-69.73%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is at 53.23%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-69.73%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 53.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-193.38%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is at 23384.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-193.38%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is 23384.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-193.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE is 23384.09%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-23.72%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while HUH1V.HE stands at 7.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-23.72%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while HUH1V.HE is at 7.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-23.72%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while HUH1V.HE is at 7.26%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.21%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-5.45%
Negative asset growth while HUH1V.HE invests at 0.25%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-28.18%
We have a declining book value while HUH1V.HE shows 6.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-4.21%
We’re deleveraging while HUH1V.HE stands at 2.84%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.