5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.92%
Positive revenue growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.44%
Positive gross profit growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-86.34%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-86.34%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-94.29%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-93.02%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-93.02%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-23.54%
Share reduction while HUH1V.HE is at 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-23.54%
Reduced diluted shares while HUH1V.HE is at 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
206.25%
Positive OCF growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
146.94%
Positive FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
9.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 30.45%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
9.04%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 30.45%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.04%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 30.45%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-35.72%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-35.72%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-35.72%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
113.33%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 25.11% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
113.33%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 25.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
113.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 25.11%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.40%
Inventory is declining while HUH1V.HE stands at 1.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.64%
Positive asset growth while HUH1V.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
33.53%
BV/share growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 3.45%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
2.50%
We have some new debt while HUH1V.HE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.