PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.440.14 (-2.51%)
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.10%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.19%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-33.22%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-33.22%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-59.09%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-66.67%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-66.67%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
22.73%
Slight or no buybacks while HUH1V.HE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
22.73%
Diluted share count expanding well above HUH1V.HE's 0.03%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
335.14%
OCF growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 2.50%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-2119.05%
Negative FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 16.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-28.51%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 28.30%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-28.51%
Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 28.30%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-31.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 15.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-88.58%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-88.58%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-43.90%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 4.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
108.33%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 0.99% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
108.33%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 0.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-82.89%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.01%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.05%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-2.65%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-15.67%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-17.87%
We have a declining book value while HUH1V.HE shows 1.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-29.46%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.64%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.