PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.440.14 (-2.51%)
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.60%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-59.67%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
58.55%
Positive EBIT growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
58.55%
Positive operating income growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
331.94%
Positive net income growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
332.00%
Positive EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
332.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
279.31%
Positive OCF growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
102.76%
Positive FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-30.44%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-30.44%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-34.95%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 15.98%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-29.20%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-29.20%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
265.51%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
140.23%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 14611.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
140.23%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 14611.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
227.62%
Positive short-term CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-18.41%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while HUH1V.HE stands at 5.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-18.41%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while HUH1V.HE is at 5.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-22.84%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45.38%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
4.43%
We show growth while HUH1V.HE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.77%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
3.04%
BV/share growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 0.46%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-6.26%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.95%
We cut SG&A while HUH1V.HE invests at 0.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.