PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.440.14 (-2.51%)
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.01%
Positive revenue growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.21%
Positive gross profit growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
5.90%
Positive EBIT growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
5.90%
Positive operating income growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
23.81%
Positive net income growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
19.96%
Positive EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
19.96%
Positive diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
3.17%
Share count expansion well above HUH1V.HE's 0.32%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.17%
Diluted share count expanding well above HUH1V.HE's 0.32%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-43.93%
Negative OCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 151.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-41.13%
Negative FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 380.77%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-26.25%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 33.09%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-26.25%
Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 33.09%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-29.91%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 30.30%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-32.08%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-32.08%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
139.50%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 26.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
124.28%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 14.13% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
124.28%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 14.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
152.97%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 82.47%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.21%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while HUH1V.HE is at 13.36%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.68%
Firm’s AR is declining while HUH1V.HE shows 3.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-2.01%
Inventory is declining while HUH1V.HE stands at 2.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.69%
Asset growth at 50-75% of HUH1V.HE's 4.79%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
-0.51%
We have a declining book value while HUH1V.HE shows 8.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.26%
Debt shrinking faster vs. HUH1V.HE's 2.25%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.01%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.