PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.440.14 (-2.51%)
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.80%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-56.27%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-80.35%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-80.35%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-70.67%
Negative net income growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 37.29%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-69.81%
Negative EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 37.93%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-69.81%
Negative diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 37.93%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-2.89%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-2.89%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.83%
OCF growth under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 124.46%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
21.40%
FCF growth under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 269.18%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-24.72%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-24.72%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-8.80%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
65.54%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with HUH1V.HE's 67.77%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
65.54%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to HUH1V.HE's 67.77%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
446.94%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 9.49%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
108.19%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 40145.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
108.19%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 40145.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
102.79%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 71.99%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
-16.09%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while HUH1V.HE stands at 15.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-16.09%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while HUH1V.HE is at 15.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
10.00%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 8.02%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.25%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-2.35%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.32%
Negative asset growth while HUH1V.HE invests at 0.69%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.41%
1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 1.17%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-2.90%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.26%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.