PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.440.14 (-2.51%)
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.67%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-4.16%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-18.75%
Negative EBIT growth while HUH1V.HE is at 22.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-18.75%
Negative operating income growth while HUH1V.HE is at 22.09%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-51.01%
Negative net income growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 28.82%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-46.67%
Negative EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 34.37%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-46.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 34.37%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-8.14%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-8.14%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
65.77%
Positive OCF growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
266.79%
Positive FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-23.89%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 50.43%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-27.08%
Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 35.17%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-30.20%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 15.32%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
30.50%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
540.99%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 11.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
103.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 25.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
133.33%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 65.20% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-31.58%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is 45.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
150.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 32.04%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.03%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while HUH1V.HE is at 14.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-7.88%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while HUH1V.HE is at 7.37%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.50%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-4.03%
Inventory is declining while HUH1V.HE stands at 2.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.55%
Positive asset growth while HUH1V.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
9.74%
BV/share growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 2.42%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.18%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.61%
We cut SG&A while HUH1V.HE invests at 7.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.