PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.92%
Negative revenue growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 10.37%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
0.85%
Gross profit growth under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 16.96%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
5.50%
EBIT growth below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 34.55%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
5.50%
Operating income growth under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 34.55%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-2.93%
Negative net income growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 33.49%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-14.29%
Negative EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 32.50%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-14.29%
Negative diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 32.50%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
13.25%
Share count expansion well above HUH1V.HE's 0.07%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
13.25%
Diluted share count expanding well above HUH1V.HE's 0.07%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.45%
Positive OCF growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
5.36%
Positive FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-38.04%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 52.96%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-42.49%
Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 37.21%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-36.19%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 19.51%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
4.86%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-217.21%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is at 33.25%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-355.17%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
120.93%
Similar net income/share CAGR to HUH1V.HE's 115.59%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
135.29%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 72.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-0.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE is 96.52%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.29%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while HUH1V.HE is at 24.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-6.77%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while HUH1V.HE is at 33.03%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
132.59%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 18.34%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-7.18%
Firm’s AR is declining while HUH1V.HE shows 16.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
6.31%
Inventory growth well above HUH1V.HE's 2.28%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-4.84%
Negative asset growth while HUH1V.HE invests at 5.85%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-10.52%
We have a declining book value while HUH1V.HE shows 1.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
1.15%
Debt shrinking faster vs. HUH1V.HE's 13.20%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.74%
We cut SG&A while HUH1V.HE invests at 13.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.