PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.440.14 (-2.51%)
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.04%
Positive revenue growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-8.38%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-22.90%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-22.90%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-19.83%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-16.67%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-16.67%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-3.79%
Share reduction while HUH1V.HE is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.79%
Reduced diluted shares while HUH1V.HE is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
401.80%
OCF growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 84.10%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
168.23%
FCF growth 50-75% of HUH1V.HE's 247.86%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
-39.39%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 56.06%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-42.40%
Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 52.78%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-15.23%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 21.64%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-14.87%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 1.71%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
200.18%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 118.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
645.27%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 38.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
120.83%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 78.51% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
145.45%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of HUH1V.HE's 185.38%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
150.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 76.76%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.34%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while HUH1V.HE is at 41.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
17.76%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 36.17%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.96%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-3.28%
Inventory is declining while HUH1V.HE stands at 1.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.41%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
4.38%
Similar to HUH1V.HE's 4.09%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-1.32%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.34%
We expand SG&A while HUH1V.HE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.