5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.68%
Revenue growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 4.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-2.93%
Negative gross profit growth while HUH1V.HE is at 8.98%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
3.76%
EBIT growth below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 21.10%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.76%
Operating income growth under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 21.10%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
2.34%
Net income growth under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 22.75%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-10.00%
Negative EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 20.93%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-10.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 20.93%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
13.71%
Share count expansion well above HUH1V.HE's 0.12%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
13.71%
Diluted share count expanding well above HUH1V.HE's 0.12%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.92%
OCF growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 17.63%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
241.10%
FCF growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 58.89%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-30.92%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 58.82%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-23.62%
Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 21.89%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-14.59%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 22.25%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
258.09%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
197.48%
Positive OCF/share growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-63.92%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 141.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
131.40%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 111.68%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
-78.98%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is 32.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
85.36%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 41.20%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.66%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 32.09%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
16.47%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 37.63%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.59%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 28.15%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
9.45%
AR growth well above HUH1V.HE's 2.97%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-5.88%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.86%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-7.18%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-3.10%
We’re deleveraging while HUH1V.HE stands at 11.04%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.07%
We expand SG&A while HUH1V.HE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.