PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.440.14 (-2.51%)
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.93%
Positive revenue growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
4.57%
Positive gross profit growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
29.21%
Positive EBIT growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
29.21%
Positive operating income growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
12.29%
Positive net income growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
22.22%
Positive EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
22.22%
Positive diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-8.13%
Share reduction while HUH1V.HE is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-8.13%
Reduced diluted shares while HUH1V.HE is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
81.94%
OCF growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 45.41%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
141.37%
FCF growth under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 540.54%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-31.36%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 58.51%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-37.05%
Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 21.51%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-6.92%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 19.09%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-10.70%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
38.92%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 31.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
31.48%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of HUH1V.HE's 40.36%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
145.83%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 71.36% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
243.75%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 36.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
88.80%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 50.14%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.23%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while HUH1V.HE is at 29.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
30.35%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to HUH1V.HE's 29.72%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.94%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-3.32%
Inventory is declining while HUH1V.HE stands at 3.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.14%
Positive asset growth while HUH1V.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
11.35%
BV/share growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 1.43%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
1.70%
We have some new debt while HUH1V.HE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.90%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.