PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.440.14 (-2.51%)
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.41%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-7.38%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
18.84%
Positive EBIT growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
18.84%
Positive operating income growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
37.56%
Positive net income growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
33.33%
Positive EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
33.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
3.17%
Share count expansion well above HUH1V.HE's 0.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.17%
Diluted share count expanding well above HUH1V.HE's 0.03%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
48.48%
Positive OCF growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
90.35%
Positive FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-32.26%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 68.46%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-5.25%
Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 31.30%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-11.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 11.98%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-29.11%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
520.62%
Positive OCF/share growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-45.68%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
166.67%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 50.36% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
700.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 48.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
100.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.65%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with HUH1V.HE's 51.41%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
16.80%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of HUH1V.HE's 29.03%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.70%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
3.35%
Inventory growth well above HUH1V.HE's 3.12%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.19%
Positive asset growth while HUH1V.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.43%
BV/share growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 0.93%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-2.92%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.45%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.