PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.21%
Positive revenue growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
15.43%
Positive gross profit growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
96.75%
Positive EBIT growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
96.75%
Positive operating income growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
133.94%
Positive net income growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
150.00%
Positive EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
150.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-6.43%
Share reduction while HUH1V.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-6.43%
Reduced diluted shares while HUH1V.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.63%
Negative OCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 666.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-31.92%
Negative FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 380.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-45.85%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 47.54%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-4.11%
Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 11.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
12.57%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 2.91%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
354.26%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 120.52%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
37.09%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of HUH1V.HE's 63.64%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
119.88%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of HUH1V.HE's 146.12%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
600.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 27.70% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-0.00%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is 34.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
66.67%
Positive short-term CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3.68%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 70.69%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
33.38%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of HUH1V.HE's 54.43%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
31.55%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 26.58%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
129.06%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while HUH1V.HE is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
42.58%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while HUH1V.HE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
2.44%
Our AR growth while HUH1V.HE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
6.19%
We show growth while HUH1V.HE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.35%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
3.07%
1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 2.09%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
4.18%
We have some new debt while HUH1V.HE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.87%
We expand SG&A while HUH1V.HE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.