PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.440.14 (-2.51%)
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.14%
Negative revenue growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 2.19%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-11.95%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-4.15%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-4.15%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-2.59%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-4.35%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-4.35%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.70%
Share count expansion well above HUH1V.HE's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.84%
Diluted share count expanding well above HUH1V.HE's 0.00%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-55.90%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-66.85%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-29.30%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 89.41%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
22.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to HUH1V.HE's 23.97%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
9.81%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of HUH1V.HE's 14.85%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
177.06%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 42.24%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-7.70%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
10.84%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 24.77%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
302.27%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 153.93% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
344.99%
Positive 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
39.06%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 5.64%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
50.41%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of HUH1V.HE's 83.11%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
71.58%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 29.71%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
30.65%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 16.66%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.69%
Firm’s AR is declining while HUH1V.HE shows 12.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
0.61%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. HUH1V.HE's 15.75%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
3.38%
Asset growth well under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 17.05%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.29%
1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 3.72%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-0.20%
We’re deleveraging while HUH1V.HE stands at 45.84%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.59%
SG&A declining or stable vs. HUH1V.HE's 11.97%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.