Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)

Negative revenue growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 0.59%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Share count expansion well above HUH1V.HE's 0.09%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.

Diluted share count expanding well above HUH1V.HE's 0.09%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.

Dividend reduction while HUH1V.HE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.

OCF growth under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 1651.39%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.

FCF growth under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 462.45%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 39.72%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 25.76%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 85.97%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is at 13.64%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 295.84%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.

Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of HUH1V.HE's 94.24%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while HUH1V.HE is at 1.45%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.

Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.

Negative near-term dividend growth while HUH1V.HE invests at 17.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.