PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.560.02 (-0.36%)
5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.32%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-7.80%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
86.36%
EBIT growth similar to METSB.HE's 86.36%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
86.36%
Operating income growth similar to METSB.HE's 86.36%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
400.00%
Net income growth comparable to METSB.HE's 400.00%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
333.33%
EPS growth similar to METSB.HE's 333.33%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
333.33%
Similar diluted EPS growth to METSB.HE's 333.33%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
23.08%
Share count expansion well above METSB.HE's 23.08%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
23.08%
Diluted share count expanding well above METSB.HE's 23.08%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-192.65%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-324.78%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-13.56%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-13.56%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-13.56%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-179.07%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-179.07%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-179.07%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
160.54%
Similar net income/share CAGR to METSB.HE's 160.54%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
160.54%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 160.54%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
160.54%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 160.54%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
-3.23%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-3.23%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-3.23%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.70%
Inventory growth well above METSB.HE's 3.70%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.95%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-14.94%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-3.14%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.