PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.560.02 (-0.36%)
5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.11%
Revenue growth similar to METSB.HE's 5.11%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
8.69%
Gross profit growth similar to METSB.HE's 8.69%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
-15.12%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-15.12%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-80.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-84.62%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-84.62%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
30.00%
Share count expansion well above METSB.HE's 30.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
30.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above METSB.HE's 30.00%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
240.32%
Similar OCF growth to METSB.HE's 240.32%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
167.70%
FCF growth similar to METSB.HE's 167.70%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
-28.85%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-28.85%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-29.64%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
623.18%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with METSB.HE's 623.18%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
623.18%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to METSB.HE's 623.18%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
181.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 181.38%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
105.76%
Similar net income/share CAGR to METSB.HE's 105.76%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
105.76%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 105.76%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
-66.67%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.48%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.21%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.78%
Inventory growth well above METSB.HE's 2.78%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-1.92%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-25.54%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-7.64%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.