5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.10%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.19%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-33.22%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-33.22%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-59.09%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-66.67%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-66.67%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
22.73%
Share count expansion well above METSB.HE's 22.73%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
22.73%
Diluted share count expanding well above METSB.HE's 22.73%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
335.14%
Similar OCF growth to METSB.HE's 335.14%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
-2119.05%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-28.51%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-28.51%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-31.50%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-88.58%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-88.58%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-43.90%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
108.33%
Similar net income/share CAGR to METSB.HE's 108.33%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
108.33%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 108.33%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
-82.89%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.01%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.05%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-2.65%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-15.67%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-17.87%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-29.46%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.64%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.