PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.560.02 (-0.36%)
5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.70%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.46%
Gross profit growth similar to METSB.HE's 0.46%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
55.92%
EBIT growth similar to METSB.HE's 55.92%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
55.92%
Operating income growth similar to METSB.HE's 55.92%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
86.69%
Net income growth comparable to METSB.HE's 86.69%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
66.67%
EPS growth similar to METSB.HE's 66.67%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
66.67%
Similar diluted EPS growth to METSB.HE's 66.67%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
12.01%
Share count expansion well above METSB.HE's 12.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
12.01%
Diluted share count expanding well above METSB.HE's 12.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.69%
Similar OCF growth to METSB.HE's 71.69%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
-407.87%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-18.90%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-43.53%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-10.34%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
353.57%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with METSB.HE's 353.57%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
285.47%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to METSB.HE's 285.47%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
256.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 256.35%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
152.33%
Similar net income/share CAGR to METSB.HE's 152.33%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
600.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 600.00%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
-64.97%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.27%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
12.10%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 12.10%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.47%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-8.40%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-4.19%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.68%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-2.07%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.08%
SG&A growth well above METSB.HE's 3.08%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.