PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.540.04 (-0.72%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-277.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.68%
Revenue growth similar to METSB.HE's 6.68%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
-2.93%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
3.76%
EBIT growth similar to METSB.HE's 3.76%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
3.76%
Operating income growth similar to METSB.HE's 3.76%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
2.34%
Net income growth comparable to METSB.HE's 2.34%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
-10.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-10.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
13.71%
Share count expansion well above METSB.HE's 13.71%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
13.71%
Diluted share count expanding well above METSB.HE's 13.71%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.92%
Similar OCF growth to METSB.HE's 44.92%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
241.10%
FCF growth similar to METSB.HE's 241.10%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
-30.92%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-23.62%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-14.59%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
258.09%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with METSB.HE's 258.09%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
197.48%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to METSB.HE's 197.48%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
-63.92%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
131.40%
Similar net income/share CAGR to METSB.HE's 131.40%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
-78.98%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
85.36%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 85.36%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.66%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with METSB.HE's 13.66%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
16.47%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 16.47%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.59%
3Y dividend/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 103.59%. Walter Schloss finds parallel short-term dividend strategies for both companies.
9.45%
AR growth well above METSB.HE's 9.45%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-5.88%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.86%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-7.18%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-3.10%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.07%
SG&A growth well above METSB.HE's 9.07%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.