PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.540.04 (-0.72%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-277.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.29%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of STERV.HE's 16.90%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
12.29%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of STERV.HE's 20.03%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
-28.57%
Negative EBIT growth while STERV.HE is at 74.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-28.57%
Negative operating income growth while STERV.HE is at 74.72%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-142.11%
Negative net income growth while STERV.HE stands at 56.75%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-150.00%
Negative EPS growth while STERV.HE is at 53.85%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-150.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while STERV.HE is at 53.85%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-15.79%
Share reduction while STERV.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-15.79%
Reduced diluted shares while STERV.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while STERV.HE stands at 79300.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
48.84%
OCF growth under 50% of STERV.HE's 183.87%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
36.00%
FCF growth under 50% of STERV.HE's 3125.68%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
43.62%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
43.62%
Positive 5Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
43.62%
Positive 3Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-36.71%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-36.71%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while STERV.HE is at 39.68%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-36.71%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while STERV.HE stands at 12.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
89.53%
Positive 10Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
89.53%
Below 50% of STERV.HE's 1238.97%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
89.53%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 12.60%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.51%
Inventory growth well above STERV.HE's 2.30%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.01%
Asset growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 1.88%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
18.50%
BV/share growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 4.64%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
15.46%
We have some new debt while STERV.HE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.