PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.540.04 (-0.72%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-277.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.07%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-2.07%
Negative gross profit growth while STERV.HE is at 0.48%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
88.57%
EBIT growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 28.43%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
88.57%
Operating income growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 28.43%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
575.00%
Net income growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 21.43%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
500.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 25.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
500.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 25.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
21.87%
Share change of 21.87% while STERV.HE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
21.87%
Diluted share change of 21.87% while STERV.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.64%
Positive OCF growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
46.88%
Positive FCF growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
4.37%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
4.37%
Positive 5Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
4.37%
Positive 3Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-79.64%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-79.64%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-79.64%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
148.72%
Positive 10Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
148.72%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of STERV.HE's 196.26%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
148.72%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to STERV.HE's 143.91%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.99%
Inventory growth well above STERV.HE's 4.33%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.41%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x STERV.HE's 2.68%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
-13.05%
We have a declining book value while STERV.HE shows 4.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
1.72%
Debt growth far above STERV.HE's 0.28%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.