PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.560.02 (-0.36%)
5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.65%
Negative revenue growth while STERV.HE stands at 3.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-3.65%
Negative gross profit growth while STERV.HE is at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-169.57%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-169.57%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-310.71%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-312.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-312.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.84%
Share reduction while STERV.HE is at 1.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.84%
Reduced diluted shares while STERV.HE is at 1.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.43%
Negative OCF growth while STERV.HE is at 1142.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-160.87%
Negative FCF growth while STERV.HE is at 246.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
7.74%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
7.74%
Positive 5Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
7.74%
Positive 3Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
181.17%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
181.17%
Positive OCF/share growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
181.17%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 17.28%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
40.69%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 5.46% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
40.69%
Below 50% of STERV.HE's 247.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
40.69%
Below 50% of STERV.HE's 475.37%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.58%
Inventory is declining while STERV.HE stands at 0.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-7.23%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.44%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-10.45%
We’re deleveraging while STERV.HE stands at 0.41%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.