PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.540.04 (-0.72%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-277.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.67%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-79.85%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
59.38%
Positive EBIT growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
59.38%
Positive operating income growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
44.07%
Positive net income growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
35.29%
Positive EPS growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
35.29%
Positive diluted EPS growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-13.56%
Share reduction while STERV.HE is at 5.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-13.56%
Reduced diluted shares while STERV.HE is at 5.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.88%
OCF growth under 50% of STERV.HE's 98.55%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
107.14%
FCF growth under 50% of STERV.HE's 233.99%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
5.21%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
5.21%
Positive 5Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
5.21%
Positive 3Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-71.64%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-71.64%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-71.64%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while STERV.HE stands at 14.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
54.17%
Positive 10Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
54.17%
Positive 5Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
54.17%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to STERV.HE's 60.14%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.39%
We show growth while STERV.HE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.21%
Positive asset growth while STERV.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
11.60%
Positive BV/share change while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
3.40%
Debt growth far above STERV.HE's 6.36%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.