PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.560.02 (-0.36%)
5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.02%
Negative revenue growth while STERV.HE stands at 1.87%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.03%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-16.95%
Negative EBIT growth while STERV.HE is at 270.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-16.95%
Negative operating income growth while STERV.HE is at 270.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
120.00%
Net income growth at 50-75% of STERV.HE's 211.76%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
200.00%
EPS growth similar to STERV.HE's 192.59%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
200.00%
Similar diluted EPS growth to STERV.HE's 192.59%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
-26.67%
Share reduction while STERV.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-26.67%
Reduced diluted shares while STERV.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
5272.73%
Dividend growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 3285.71%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-108.37%
Negative OCF growth while STERV.HE is at 8275.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-148.00%
Negative FCF growth while STERV.HE is at 368.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-2.89%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-2.89%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-32.38%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
79.10%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
79.10%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of STERV.HE's 156.07%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
84.71%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 9.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
120.93%
Positive 10Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
120.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
300.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.04%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.87%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
4.86%
We show growth while STERV.HE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.06%
Positive asset growth while STERV.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
32.93%
Positive BV/share change while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
3.44%
We have some new debt while STERV.HE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.39%
We expand SG&A while STERV.HE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.