PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.560.02 (-0.36%)
5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.60%
Negative revenue growth while STERV.HE stands at 1.88%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-59.67%
Negative gross profit growth while STERV.HE is at 14.51%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
58.55%
Positive EBIT growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
58.55%
Positive operating income growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
331.94%
Positive net income growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
332.00%
Positive EPS growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
332.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
279.31%
OCF growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 33.33%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
102.76%
FCF growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 29.78%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-30.44%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-30.44%
Negative 5Y CAGR while STERV.HE stands at 9.27%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-34.95%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-29.20%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while STERV.HE stands at 123.35%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-29.20%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while STERV.HE is at 29.38%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
265.51%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 92.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
140.23%
Positive 10Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
140.23%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 77.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
227.62%
Positive short-term CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-18.41%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-18.41%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-22.84%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45.38%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
4.43%
We show growth while STERV.HE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.77%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
3.04%
Positive BV/share change while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.26%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.95%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.