PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.70%
Negative revenue growth while STERV.HE stands at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-52.50%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-10.23%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-10.23%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
7.12%
Positive net income growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
9.09%
Positive EPS growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
9.09%
Positive diluted EPS growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.19%
OCF growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 29.67%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
31.61%
Positive FCF growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-33.99%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-23.64%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-12.31%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
129.37%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of STERV.HE's 221.08%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
390.08%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 22.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
38.56%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x STERV.HE's 30.39%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
154.88%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of STERV.HE's 228.61%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-9.36%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
569.68%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 239.20%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
12.96%
Positive growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
16.73%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 3.86%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
34.63%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 18.50%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.03%
Firm’s AR is declining while STERV.HE shows 0.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.73%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.92%
Asset growth well under 50% of STERV.HE's 2.62%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.74%
1.25-1.5x STERV.HE's 3.55%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-11.57%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.77%
SG&A growth of 9.77% while STERV.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.