PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.560.02 (-0.36%)
5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.21%
Negative revenue growth while STERV.HE stands at 0.37%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
1.22%
Gross profit growth under 50% of STERV.HE's 47.31%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-52.94%
Negative EBIT growth while STERV.HE is at 300.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-52.94%
Negative operating income growth while STERV.HE is at 300.59%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-50.15%
Negative net income growth while STERV.HE stands at 642.86%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-45.30%
Negative EPS growth while STERV.HE is at 633.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-45.30%
Negative diluted EPS growth while STERV.HE is at 633.33%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-8.86%
Share reduction while STERV.HE is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-8.86%
Reduced diluted shares while STERV.HE is at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.57%
OCF growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 52.26%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
36.70%
FCF growth 50-75% of STERV.HE's 56.43%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
-22.84%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while STERV.HE stands at 5.52%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
2.50%
Positive 5Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
30.22%
Positive 3Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
113.59%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 13.59%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
29.03%
Below 50% of STERV.HE's 77.07%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
88.76%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 53.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
123.28%
Below 50% of STERV.HE's 992.44%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
184.15%
Below 50% of STERV.HE's 516.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-24.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while STERV.HE is 471.43%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
42.76%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with STERV.HE's 44.98%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
70.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 46.53%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
45.96%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 27.95%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.86%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-5.05%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.87%
Asset growth well under 50% of STERV.HE's 4.30%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
13.09%
BV/share growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 8.23%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-3.84%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.56%
SG&A growth well above STERV.HE's 1.81%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.