PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.10%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-23.17%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-51.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-51.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-70.84%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-70.53%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-70.53%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.28%
Share reduction while STERV.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.28%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.66%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-152.85%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-17.85%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-5.44%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
2.58%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of STERV.HE's 12.30%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
449.55%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-57.69%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-78.98%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-6.73%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-53.37%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-62.69%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
94.40%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of STERV.HE's 110.33%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
58.86%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of STERV.HE's 83.12%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
46.18%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of STERV.HE's 52.76%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
866.68%
Stable or rising dividend while STERV.HE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
202.74%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while STERV.HE is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
162.32%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while STERV.HE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-14.09%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-6.68%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-10.10%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.73%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.42%
Debt shrinking faster vs. STERV.HE's 18.65%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.01%
We expand SG&A while STERV.HE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.