PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.29%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 9.51%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
12.29%
Gross profit growth under 50% of UPM.HE's 32.34%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-28.57%
Negative EBIT growth while UPM.HE is at 115.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-28.57%
Negative operating income growth while UPM.HE is at 115.79%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-142.11%
Negative net income growth while UPM.HE stands at 141.43%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-150.00%
Negative EPS growth while UPM.HE is at 153.85%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-150.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while UPM.HE is at 153.85%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-15.79%
Share reduction while UPM.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-15.79%
Reduced diluted shares while UPM.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while UPM.HE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
48.84%
Positive OCF growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
36.00%
Positive FCF growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
43.62%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
43.62%
Positive 5Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
43.62%
Positive 3Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-36.71%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-36.71%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-36.71%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
89.53%
Positive 10Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
89.53%
Below 50% of UPM.HE's 689.48%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
89.53%
Below 50% of UPM.HE's 186.53%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.51%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. UPM.HE's 6.73%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
5.01%
Asset growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 2.91%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
18.50%
BV/share growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 5.62%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
15.46%
Debt growth far above UPM.HE's 5.21%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.