PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.45%
Revenue growth similar to UPM.HE's 0.47%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
0.45%
Gross profit growth under 50% of UPM.HE's 494.95%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-106.06%
Negative EBIT growth while UPM.HE is at 20.98%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-106.06%
Negative operating income growth while UPM.HE is at 20.98%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-157.89%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-156.42%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-156.42%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-228.57%
Negative OCF growth while UPM.HE is at 4.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
6.92%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
6.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
6.92%
Positive 3Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-142.78%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-142.78%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while UPM.HE is at 64.13%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-142.78%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 15.10%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
68.48%
Positive 10Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
68.48%
Below 50% of UPM.HE's 214.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
68.48%
Below 50% of UPM.HE's 347.22%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
5.73%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of UPM.HE's 10.17%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
5.73%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
5.73%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 3.28%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.09%
We show growth while UPM.HE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.20%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-1.19%
We have a declining book value while UPM.HE shows 2.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.74%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.