PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.11%
Positive revenue growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.69%
Positive gross profit growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-15.12%
Negative EBIT growth while UPM.HE is at 104.86%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-15.12%
Negative operating income growth while UPM.HE is at 104.86%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-80.00%
Negative net income growth while UPM.HE stands at 103.15%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-84.62%
Negative EPS growth while UPM.HE is at 103.18%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-84.62%
Negative diluted EPS growth while UPM.HE is at 103.18%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
30.00%
Share change of 30.00% while UPM.HE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
30.00%
Diluted share change of 30.00% while UPM.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
240.32%
Positive OCF growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
167.70%
Positive FCF growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-28.85%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-28.85%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-29.64%
Negative 3Y CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 19.89%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
623.18%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
623.18%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 100.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
181.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
105.76%
Positive 10Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
105.76%
Positive 5Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-66.67%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.48%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while UPM.HE is at 13.67%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.21%
Negative near-term dividend growth while UPM.HE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.78%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. UPM.HE's 7.10%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.92%
Negative asset growth while UPM.HE invests at 15.32%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-25.54%
We have a declining book value while UPM.HE shows 27.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-7.64%
We’re deleveraging while UPM.HE stands at 6.85%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.