PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.92%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.85%
Gross profit growth under 50% of UPM.HE's 2.31%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
5.50%
Positive EBIT growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
5.50%
Positive operating income growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-2.93%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-14.29%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-14.29%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
13.25%
Share change of 13.25% while UPM.HE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
13.25%
Diluted share change of 13.25% while UPM.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.45%
OCF growth under 50% of UPM.HE's 27.27%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
5.36%
FCF growth under 50% of UPM.HE's 29.39%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-38.04%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-42.49%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-36.19%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
4.86%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of UPM.HE's 67.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-217.21%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while UPM.HE is at 51.07%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-355.17%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 411.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
120.93%
Below 50% of UPM.HE's 287.04%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
135.29%
Positive 5Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-0.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while UPM.HE is 71.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.29%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while UPM.HE is at 3.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-6.77%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while UPM.HE is at 3.06%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
132.59%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 24.86%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-7.18%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
6.31%
We show growth while UPM.HE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-4.84%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-10.52%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
1.15%
We have some new debt while UPM.HE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.74%
We cut SG&A while UPM.HE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.