PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.520.06 (-1.08%)
5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.7K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-276.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.14%
Negative revenue growth while UPM.HE stands at 1.27%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-51.16%
Negative gross profit growth while UPM.HE is at 485.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
44.74%
Positive EBIT growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
44.74%
Positive operating income growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
32.80%
Positive net income growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
32.80%
Positive EPS growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
32.80%
Positive diluted EPS growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.66%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-14.78%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-40.75%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-28.21%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-14.82%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
13.15%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
273.87%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 28.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
59.82%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 53.42%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
130.92%
Positive 10Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
110.54%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 80.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
-23.14%
Negative 3Y CAGR while UPM.HE is 415.56%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-2.19%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while UPM.HE stands at 11.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
28.23%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 8.58%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
19.89%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 9.71%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.58%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-0.99%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.76%
Asset growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 1.70%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.90%
Similar to UPM.HE's 4.66%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-10.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.10%
We cut SG&A while UPM.HE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.