PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.440.14 (-2.51%)
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.68%
Positive revenue growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-2.93%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
3.76%
Positive EBIT growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3.76%
Positive operating income growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2.34%
Positive net income growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-10.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-10.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
13.71%
Share count expansion well above UPM.HE's 0.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
13.71%
Diluted share count expanding well above UPM.HE's 0.03%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.92%
Positive OCF growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
241.10%
Positive FCF growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-30.92%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-23.62%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-14.59%
Negative 3Y CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 0.64%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
258.09%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 29.55%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
197.48%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 99.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-63.92%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 24.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
131.40%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of UPM.HE's 202.30%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-78.98%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while UPM.HE is 132.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
85.36%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 58.45%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.66%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 7.26%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
16.47%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 9.97%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.59%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 58.47%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
9.45%
AR growth well above UPM.HE's 1.78%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-5.88%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.86%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-7.18%
We have a declining book value while UPM.HE shows 1.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-3.10%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.07%
SG&A growth of 9.07% while UPM.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.