PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.440.14 (-2.51%)
5.44 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.1K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-272.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.70%
Negative revenue growth while UPM.HE stands at 3.13%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-52.50%
Negative gross profit growth while UPM.HE is at 666.67%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-10.23%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-10.23%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
7.12%
Positive net income growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
9.09%
Positive EPS growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
9.09%
Positive diluted EPS growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.19%
Positive OCF growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
31.61%
Positive FCF growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-33.99%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-23.64%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-12.31%
Negative 3Y CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 1.50%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
129.37%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 33.16%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
390.08%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 14.09%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
38.56%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
154.88%
Below 50% of UPM.HE's 635.79%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-9.36%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while UPM.HE is 116.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
569.68%
Below 50% of UPM.HE's 2935.20%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
12.96%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of UPM.HE's 22.94%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
16.73%
Below 50% of UPM.HE's 44.71%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
34.63%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 15.72%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.03%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-1.73%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.92%
Positive asset growth while UPM.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.74%
1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 4.01%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-11.57%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.77%
SG&A growth of 9.77% while UPM.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.